Onvexia: Crypto Fundamentals, Sentiment & Onchain Tracking

Score any text for crypto sentiment, tuned for crypto slang and tickers. Takes arbitrary text you supply — it does not look anything up. General sentiment models read "this is going to zero" and "wagmi" badly; this one is fitted to the register. Returns polarity plus the terms that drove it, so a score can be checked rather than trusted.

What we index per chain for watched addresses: what we see, what we miss, and what an empty feed actually means.

Events on watched addresses. Check get_address_coverage before reading an empty result as silence — below the observed USD floor, movement is invisible to us.

What this platform's own monitoring agents are currently complaining about — dead collectors, stale data streams, coverage drops. Worth checking before relying on a number: a stream flagged stale here is still being served, it is just old.

Does an AI-sector project actually ship code, against how much attention it gets. Four states, and the fourth is not a verdict: ships public repo with development activity in 30 days silent public repo, no activity in 30 days no_public_repo no repository is published for this asset unmapped WE have not checked. This is a gap in OUR coverage and must NEVER be reported as the project failing to ship. RENDER sat in this state with 447 posts while publishing code the whole time. `dev_events_30d` is null rather than 0 for the last two states: there is no repository to have produced a zero. `attention_without_substance` is only ever set where the state was actually measured.

Split an asset's sentiment by what people are actually talking about: technology, price, team and community. The aggregate can be flat while the parts disagree sharply — bullish on technology, bearish on team is a different situation from uniformly neutral, and only this tool can tell them apart.

An asset's core profile by symbol: name, category and cross-system identifiers (CoinGecko id, contract addresses, chains). Start here when you have a ticker and need to be sure which asset it refers to. Tickers collide across chains — if the symbol is ambiguous, resolve_ticker is the tool that says so instead of guessing.

Get the full fundamental brief for an asset: market snapshot, supply and valuation, project, TVL, revenue, treasury, security, governance, unlock schedule, derivatives positioning, competitive rank, valuation ratios and a graded scorecard — in one call. READ THE SECTION STATES, NOT ONLY THE VALUES. Each section is `measured`, `not_held` or `failed`, and sections the asset class cannot have are returned separately in `not_applicable`. "This chain has no DAO treasury" and "we could not read it" are different facts and this response keeps them apart. Revenue is split: `S06` is the entity's own fees, `S06b` is the total earned by protocols deployed on a chain. The two can differ by two orders of magnitude and only the first accrues to the token.

Every chain an asset is deployed on, with its contract address and token decimals.

Metrics for this asset that CHANGED after they were first published, with the old value, the new one and why. An agent that quoted an earlier number can find out here that it moved.

An asset's Galaxy Score and AltRank, with the components behind each. Galaxy Score is a composite of social and market health on a 0-100 scale; AltRank is relative standing against the rest of the universe, where 1 is best. READ THE COMPONENT BREAKDOWN — a score moved by sentiment and one moved by volume mean different things, and the composite alone cannot tell you which happened.

Per-asset social signal over time. The `available` field states plainly whether we hold it.

Get support and resistance merged across 1w/1d/4h/1h, per-timeframe indicators, and derived spot/long/short setups for an asset. Each level carries the timeframes that confirmed it and the method on each — a level agreed by four charts is a different claim from one seen on the hourly. `measured_against` names the exchange and pair every distance was computed from, and `price_age_minutes` says how old that price is. Setups are GEOMETRY, not forecasts: an entry is a level cluster, a stop is that level offset by a measured multiple of daily range, and `rr_ratio` is computed from those prices. `status` is derived per request — pending, in_zone or passed.

Accounts flagged as automated or coordinated, with the behavioural evidence. Volume from these should not be read as organic attention. READ `coverage` AND `note` BEFORE YOU READ THE LIST. No scorer is currently running, so `bot_probability` is NULL for every account and this list comes back EMPTY. An empty list here says nothing whatsoever about how clean the corpus is — it means nobody has been scored yet, and the response says so explicitly in `note`. `coverage.accounts_scored` vs `accounts_total` is the honest number: while the first is 0, treat this tool as reporting our coverage, not the market's cleanliness.

Per-chain coverage — tokens mapped, labelled addresses, whale transactions seen, and how many were attributed to a named entity. Attribution is Etherscan-derived, so it is strong on Ethereum and sparse on other chains.

Asset co-mention graph — which assets are discussed together, with what was filtered out.

Detected coordinated posting campaigns — the same message pushed by multiple accounts. Matching is exact-text, so this catches copypasta and misses the same campaign reworded.

How closely an asset's social activity tracks its price, with the lead/lag. Correlation is not causation and this endpoint does not claim it is. A high coefficient says the two series moved together over the window — it does not say which one moved first. Use get_leading_indicators for that question.

Rank social creators across the whole corpus by measured influence. Corpus-wide, unlike get_influencers which is scoped to one asset. Influence is computed from engagement our collectors actually observed, so a creator we do not ingest is absent rather than ranked low — an absence here is a coverage fact, not a judgement.

What data this platform actually holds right now: asset count, how many are priced, chains covered, labelled addresses, social corpus size, and freshness timestamps. Call this to check whether an answer is supportable before asserting it.

Public-record documents about issuers we track: SEC filings and federal court dockets. Exists because both RWA failures of 2026 were disclosed in public text before the price moved -- RealT's tax delinquency sat in court filings for a year, Goldfinch's borrower defaults were in governance forums before the vote. TWO THINGS YOU MUST NOT MISREPORT: A null `severity` means the document was FOUND and NOT ASSESSED. It is unjudged, not benign, and must never be summarised as "nothing concerning". `match_confidence: name_unverified` means the document was matched on a NAME and may concern a different company entirely -- searching for 'RealT' returns 'Broadway White Realty'. Do not attribute an unverified filing to an issuer without checking it. An empty result means nothing has been found, which for a subject never searched is not a statement about them at all.

Newly created DEX pairs above a USD liquidity floor. THE FLOOR IS RETURNED IN THE RESPONSE, and it is load-bearing: this is the long tail where most pairs are rugs or noise, and the floor is the only thing separating a signal from a list of scams. Raising it shrinks the result set and raises its quality.

Named entities extracted from social documents about an asset — people, organisations, products and other tickers mentioned alongside it. Use it to find what a narrative is actually about.

Whale flow per labelled entity over the window. Inflow to an exchange is distribution pressure; outflow is accumulation.

Net movement of an asset into and out of exchange wallets. Inflows are supply arriving somewhere it can be sold; outflows are supply leaving to self-custody. The conventional reading is distribution vs accumulation, but a single large transfer can be an exchange rebalancing its own wallets — check get_entity_flows before attributing intent.

Recent exchange listing announcements — an asset being added to a venue. A listing is an ATTENTION event, not a fundamental one: it changes who can buy, not what the project is worth. Use it to explain a volume or social spike, not as a valuation input.

Per-token flow onto and off exchanges. Inflow is distribution pressure, outflow is accumulation. net_usd where the token can be priced.

Bitcoin supply split by coin age over time — which cohorts are holding and which are moving.

The influencer leaderboard, ranked by what people actually got RIGHT rather than by how loud they are. rank_by="accountability" (default): scored Predictor vs Reactor — did the call come before the move, or after it. rank_by="accuracy": ranked by how often their price calls came true, by the Wilson lower bound of the hit rate (>= 20 resolved calls to rank), over `window_days` (30/90/180) judged at `horizon_hours` (24/168/720). Reach and accuracy are different axes, and most rankings only publish the first.

Get an influencer's track record. `view` picks one of three records: accountability (default) — did their calls precede the move (Predictor) or react to it (Reactor)? Hit rate and track record. accuracy — did their price calls come true? Hit rate over 30/90/180 days at 24h, 7d and 30d, with the Wilson lower bound and excess over BTC. calls — the receipts: each call's post excerpt and link, entry price, and what happened after 24h/7d/30d. `horizon_hours` (24, 168, 720) picks which outcome the list is sorted and filtered on. One request per call. `influencer_id` is a creator id or username.

The accounts driving conversation about one asset, by reach and engagement. Ranked by measured activity in our corpus, NOT by follower count, and NOT by whether they were right — see get_influencer_ledger for track record. A large account posting noise ranks here; that is the point of keeping the two tools separate.

Which social and on-chain signals have historically MOVED FIRST for an asset. This is the lead/lag question that get_correlation deliberately does not answer. A lead measured over a past window is not a forecast and the response does not present it as one — it is the observed ordering of two series, and it can break.

Describe one metric before you use it: parity, category, minimum interval and any caveat attached to it. CALL THIS BEFORE get_metric_timeseries if the metric is unfamiliar. The minimum interval tells you the finest resolution that is real rather than interpolated, and the caveat is where an approximate metric admits what it approximates.

Restatements of published numbers — what changed, over which period, and why. A correction is not a market move.

Timeseries for any available metric on any asset. Accepts Santiment-style relative dates ("utc_now-7d") as well as ISO timestamps. If the metric is not available this returns an error naming it rather than an empty series — an empty result here always means "no data in that range", never "we do not have this metric".

Timeseries for ONE metric across MANY assets in a single call. `assets` is comma-separated (e.g. "BTC,ETH,SOL"). Prefer this over looping get_metric_timeseries — it is one round trip instead of N, and the values are guaranteed to come from the same read.

Latest value of MANY metrics for ONE asset in a single call. `metrics` is comma-separated. The mirror of get_metric_timeseries_multi.

The raw clusters behind the stories, without the prose — for a model doing its own summarisation. Every cluster has >= 2 distinct authors; near-identical posts from one account are copypasta and excluded.

Which crypto narrative is GAINING or LOSING attention share, with a liquidity confirmation leg. Compares the last `days` against the equally long window immediately before. Covers the 2026 narrative set — RWA, tokenized equities and treasuries, stablecoins, DePIN, perp DEXs, prediction markets, AI agents — as well as DeFi, NFT, Gaming and the L1/L2 split. READ `vocabulary_stale` BEFORE QUOTING ANY DELTA. When true, the corpus spans two keyword vocabularies and a narrative whose keywords were just added will appear to be rising purely because only recent posts were ever tested against them. That is a rotation signal manufactured by a deploy, not by the market. A narrative with `unconfirmed: true` has measured attention and NO liquidity confirmation — the confirmation is absent, not zero, and the row states why.

Daily candles (open/high/low/close/volume) for an asset, with the venue they came from. Coverage is bounded by which assets have a USDT pair on Binance or Bybit — an asset absent here has no candle source we collect, which is not the same as having no price.

One asset's generated report. The `unavailable` field lists metrics the report could NOT use — read it, because a report that silently omits funding rate reads as a report about an asset with unremarkable funding.

Sentiment over time for an asset, with sample size and confidence interval. IMPORTANT: sentiment measured on few documents is unreliable — our own bootstrap put the direction wrong 35.6% of the time at n=1 and 9.5% at n=20. Read n before quoting a direction.

Get the Signal Integrity score (0-100) — is the move real or exit liquidity? Fuses social authenticity + on-chain reality + fundamental backing, with an Exit Liquidity Radar flag.

Posts nearest a given post in embedding space. Read the returned BAND, never the raw cosine — 43% of this corpus sits at 0.80-0.90 by default.

How many assets actually clear the document floor that makes each social metric computable. Call this BEFORE quoting sentiment for an asset. A large corpus total does not mean sentiment works everywhere: attention is a power law and the documents pile onto BTC, so most assets stay uncomputable.

Each asset's SHARE of total social attention over a window, with the posts, distinct authors, engagement and sentiment behind the share. Share is relative and sums across the universe, so an asset's dominance can fall while its absolute volume rises — that is the market getting louder, not the asset getting quieter. Distinct authors is the column that separates a real conversation from one account posting 400 times.

Collected social posts, optionally filtered by platform (bluesky, farcaster, reddit, 4chan, bitcointalk, rss).

List every relation and column queryable via run_sql, plus the rules and what is deliberately not exposed.

The individual posts a story was assembled from — the receipts. Call this whenever a story matters enough to check. A generated story is a summary over these posts; this is how you verify it says what the sources say rather than taking the summary on trust.

The assets ranked best by AltRank right now — relative standing, not absolute. AltRank is a RANK: 1 is the strongest in the universe. A rising AltRank in a falling market means outperforming the fall, not going up. Pair with get_asset_scores when the distinction matters.